graveyard of the gods

W.O.A. · by **NoDeity** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 12:04

Please explain what specifically is the reason that you consider me to be racist.

Also, please explain what you mean when you say that I go where I shouldn't.

by **Leouna** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 21:21

NoDeity wrote:Please explain what specifically is the reason that you consider me to be racist.

The definition of racist that contains meaning refers to people who either contribute to bad breeding or are themselves badly bred. This definition changes when culture changes. When I travel some place, this real definition of racism changes. This is because there really aren't very many offended archangel breeders with the rights to propagate the true species human.

These days, many white people are called racist believing that this is because they offend darker skinned people. The deeper truth is that in many places where angels don't breed, the whites have become racially inferior to the darker skinned peoples.

So you see, racist is really a very gut wrenching term. Now the thing about British Columbia is that you look liberal, but your culture doesn't understand itself well enough, and the result is that you turn into an extermination zone. I really like Gibson's Landing and other places up there. Maybe BC will be ready for the change after the lower 48 is on the right course.

NoDeity wrote:Also, please explain what you mean when you say that I go where I shouldn't.

We need to make boundaries. If you are content in the Great White North, then let me know, and I will phrase my messages to be as they apply to my flocks. This is not me bragging, this has to do with actual civil rights. You see, when I talk about people telling Congress that I should leave, I know that America is not capable of even considering that. I'm talking down to America.

So if you want to talk to me for the sake of understanding, go ahead and ask about civil rights and racism. Please don't ask personal questions too much now. I've been at The Game for so long that there are people ready to make trouble.

W.O.A. · by **NoDeity** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 22:28

Leouna wrote:
NoDeity wrote:Please explain what specifically is the reason that you consider me to be racist.

The definition of racist that contains meaning refers to people who either contribute to bad breeding or are themselves badly bred.

Leouna, your definition is two things:

1. wrong
2. racist

You are judging people on the basis of their "breeding" and that is blatantly racist -- and rather amusing.

NoDeity wrote:Also, please explain what you mean when you say that I go where I shouldn't.

We need to make boundaries. If you are content in the Great White North, then let me know, and I will phrase my messages to be as they apply to my flocks.

I'm never quite content (things could always be better) but I plan to stay where I am.

This is not me bragging, this has to do with actual civil rights. You see, when I talk about people telling Congress that I should leave, I know that America is not capable of even considering that. I'm talking down to America.

So if you want to talk to me for the sake of understanding, go ahead and ask about civil rights and racism. Please don't ask personal questions too much now. I've been at The Game for so long that there are people ready to make trouble.

I still have no idea what you mean when you say that I go where I shouldn't.

by **Leouna** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 10:43

NoDeity wrote:
Leouna wrote:
NoDeity wrote:Please explain what specifically is the reason that you consider me to be racist.

The definition of racist that contains meaning refers to people who either contribute to bad breeding or are themselves badly bred.

Leouna, your definition is two things:

1. wrong
2. racist

You are judging people on the basis of their "breeding" and that is blatantly racist -- and rather amusing.

NoDeity wrote:Also, please explain what you mean when you say that I go where I shouldn't.

We need to make boundaries. If you are content in the Great White North, then let me know, and I will phrase my messages to be as they apply to my flocks.

I'm never quite content (things could always be better) but I plan to stay where I am.

This is not me bragging, this has to do with actual civil rights. You see, when I talk about people telling Congress that I should leave, I know that America is not capable of even considering that. I'm talking down to America.

So if you want to talk to me for the sake of understanding, go ahead and ask about civil rights and racism. Please don't ask personal questions too much now. I've been at The Game for so long that there are people ready to make trouble.

I still have no idea what you mean when you say that I go where I shouldn't.

Understand this: In Christian society, and in my culture you are racist. You are the kind of person that doesn't get in the door.

The reason for this is simple: you define yourself in this way. Will you now stop stalking me?

W.O.A. · by **NoDeity** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:15

You can't expect people to understand you -- much less agree with you -- when you make up your own definitions willy-nilly.

Understand this: In Christian society, and in my culture you are racist. You are the kind of person that doesn't get in the door.

Understand this: your use of the word "racist" is

1. wrong
2. racist

Really, it is. Words have meanings.

Will you now stop stalking me?

How can I stop doing what I've not done?

by **Leouna** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:31

Will you now stop stalking me?

How can I stop doing what I've not done?[/quote]

Stop making messages on this thread.

W.O.A. · by **NoDeity** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 17:46

Ah. Now I understand. Because you instruct me to stay out of a thread on the board of which I am an owner and administrator, I must stay out of that thread or be labelled a stalker and a racist.

Is there anything else that you'd like to tell me about what I may or may not do with my property? :lol:

by **Leouna** » Tue Jun 22, 2004 18:41

So we know who to blame when messages are messed up around here.

Bush losing it? 
Tuesday, June 08 2004 @ 06:00 PM MDT 
Contributed by: sthompson 
 
 
Received via email from Mel Hurtig. The following is from http://www.commondreams.org. Fair use only. 
 
Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House Aides 
by Doug Thompson 
 
President George W. Bush's increasingly erratic behavior and wide mood swings has the halls of the West Wing buzzing lately as aides privately express growing concern over their leader's state of mind. 
 
In meetings with top aides and administration officials, the President goes from quoting the Bible in one breath to obscene tantrums against the media, Democrats and others that he classifies as 'enemies of the state.' 
 
Worried White House aides paint a portrait of a man on the edge, increasingly wary of those who disagree with him and paranoid of a public that no longer trusts his policies in Iraq or at home. 
 
"It reminds me of the Nixon days," says a longtime GOP political consultant with contacts in the White House. "Everybody is an enemy; everybody is out to get him. That's the mood over there." 
 
In interviews with a number of White House staffers who were willing to talk off the record, a picture of an administration under siege has emerged, led by a man who declares his decisions to be "Gods' will" and then tells aides to "*censored* over" anyone they consider to be an opponent of the administration. 
 
"We're at war, there's no doubt about it. What I don't know anymore is just who the enemy might be," says one troubled White House aide. "We seem to spend more time trying to destroy John Kerry than al Qaeda and our enemies list just keeps growing and growing." 
 
Aides say the President gets "hung up on minor details," micromanaging to the extreme while ignoring the bigger picture. He will spend hours personally reviewing and approving every attack ad against his Democratic opponent and then kiss off a meeting on economic issues. 
 
"This is what is killing us on Iraq," one aide says. "We lost focus. The President got hung up on the weapons of mass destruction and an unproven link to al Qaeda. We could have found other justifiable reasons for the war but the President insisted the focus stay on those two, tenuous items." 
 
Aides who raise questions quickly find themselves shut out of access to the President or other top advisors. Among top officials, Bushs' inner circle is shrinking. Secretary of State Colin Powell has fallen out of favor because of his growing doubts about the administration's war against Iraq. 
 
The President's abrupt dismissal of CIA Directory George Tenet Wednesday night is, aides say, an example of how he works. 
 
"Tenet wanted to quit last year but the President got his back up and wouldn't hear of it," says an aide. "That would have been the opportune time to make a change, not in the middle of an election campaign but when the director challenged the President during the meeting Wednesday, the President cut him off by saying 'that's it George. I cannot abide disloyalty. I want your resignation and I want it now." 
 
Tenet was allowed to resign "voluntarily" and Bush informed his shocked staff of the decision Thursday morning. One aide says the President actually described the decision as "God's will." 
 
God may also be the reason Attorney General John Ashcroft, the administration's lightning rod because of his questionable actions that critics argue threatens freedoms granted by the Constitution, remains part of the power elite. West Wing staffers call Bush and Ashcroft "the Blues Brothers" because "they're on a mission from God." 
 
"The Attorney General is tight with the President because of religion," says one aide. "They both believe any action is justifiable in the name of God." 
 
But the President who says he rules at the behest of God can also tongue-lash those he perceives as disloyal, calling them "*censored*ing assholes" in front of other staff, berating one cabinet official in front of others and labeling anyone who disagrees with him 'unpatriotic' or 'anti-American.' 
 
"The mood here is that we're under siege, there's no doubt about it," says one troubled aide who admits he is looking for work elsewhere. "In this administration, you don't have to wear a turban or speak Farsi to be an enemy of the United States. All you have to do is disagree with the President." 
 
The White House did not respond to requests for comment on the record. 
 
© Copyright 2004 Capitol Hill Blue

by **Leouna** » Wed Jul 14, 2004 21:05

>From: David Goodman <DGoo2000@AOL.COM>
Subject: Re: Group Thinking List Serve
Date: Sat, 10, 5:52 AM

Colleagues:

I find it fascinating that the Congressional intelligence oversight committee finds the CIA guilty of "Group Think" regarding their in-house responses to terroristic threats.

As a scientist quite aware of intelligence, in particular CIA cutouts at major universities, I find that the same "Group Think" at work when an independent scientist honestly confesses he is five to seven years ahead of his peers intellectually.

Thank God that free will permits us independent scientists to unsubscribe.

Cordially,

David

****************************************************************
THE SOCIETY FOR CHAOS THEORY IN PSYCHOLOGY AND LIFE SCIENCES

David,

I've said it before and I'll say it again:

The Jews who call themselves Jews are certainly not America's biggest problem.

Think American Chancellory exclusive of no organized religion that respects diversity, and allows us Absolutists to talk to each other.

Rita Hill, DCI

by **Leouna** » Sun Sep 19, 2004 16:27

Ok, here are the questions. You can be short or as detailed as you like
in your answers.

1) Tell us a little bit about yourself and your life goals.

2) Describe some of your hobbies.

3) On your personal web site, you refer to yourself as a "bastard noble". What does this mean?

4) You use the words "angel-breeding" and "racist" in many of your posts. How would you personally define these terms?

5) Many FrostCloud members are completely baffled by what you write. Does this frustrate you in any way, or are you purposely trying to confuse people?

6) Many Christians find it sinful to have sexual relations with the same sex. Yet, you state in your profile that you're a "Christian lesbian". Does this bother you that many people of your same faith find your stance morally wrong?

7) How do you see the world within the next 100 years?

Anything else you'd like to say to the members?

1) Tell us a little bit about yourself and your life goals.

I'm a 48 year old intentional hybrid who really didn't know who I was until I became 45. People like me are called "angel breeders", because this has been the way we are for all of recorded time. Becoming aware of the circumstance of my genesis gave rise in me to indignation, and a desire to just be myself. This sets me on a road to liberate others so that I can achieve my own liberation in place and family. Peace, love, and understanding are more distant concepts.

My present goal is to liberate the town of Trinidad, Colorado, USA. This involves creating understanding that allows anglos and hispanics to endure side by side. We need to take back churches so this can happen.

2) Describe some of your hobbies.

I have a kiln and a potters wheel and I enjoy inventing glazes. I'm an accomplished software geek who used to work in silicon valley, and have a decent Macintosh system. I own a mountain cottage and an RV. Biking and hiking are hobbies I enjoy, though lately my physical activity involves calisthenics twice a day, and walking everywhere.

For a few years I have left my hobbies on the back burner, as my bliss has been taking me in a more cultural direction. I came to faith, and got my wings without the operating manual, so to speak. Oversteering the culture was a problem starting out, but I'm starting to feel comfortable. As an example, my admonishing of Colin Powell for improper use of the word "genocide" shows I'm capable of laid back culture tweaking.

3) On your personal web site, you refer to yourself as a "bastard noble". What does this mean?

My mom got pregnant with me in the summer of 1955, in Arcata, California. The sire with the chromosomes to make me with her is Otto von Habsburg. Otto is Regent Emperor, as opposed to Holy Roman Emperor. The Habsburg/Lorraine line was used, but the angel kings' blood was covertly reestablished in Otto. Therefore, the Emperor of Christendom actually derives his pedigree from me, as I am the first, third generation noble of Emperor Friedrich-Wilhelm III, who bred out of flock, disqualifying the next two generations from being noble solely by birth. I parted The Hague and am noble by deed.

By the way, I should probably stop calling myself "bastard", as Otto and my mother did a noble deed. Perhaps when the Windsors give up their gripe about the Richard I/ Louis VIII connection, I will be more properly respectful.

4) You use the words "angel-breeding" and "racist" in many of your posts. How would you personally define these terms?

angel-breeding -

For centuries, the concept of breeding made stable civilization. Breeders were not only a class, but a separate race. Dominae were both priest by birth, and the descendants of giants who looked like normal people. The breeders needed to be able to help infertile people breed without adding extra male or female characteristics to the progeny. We were born, bred, ascended, and reborn in a ritual written in the DNA that spoke to our angel breeder spirits.

Angel Breeder -

1) Sire of hybrids, particularly XYY males.
2) Breeder chosen by ethnic ritual.
3) Lamb, or breeder of angels, chosen by ritual written in the non-redacted Holy Bible.

Racist -

American people especially have a problem with this word. Post Modern culture collapses two concepts: racial intolerance, and racism into the word racism. The original word derives from angel culture, and was intended to mean "bad breeding", but took an unfortunate shot at dark people, and seems to have died by ricochet.

So, skin color aside, to understand racism, we need to come back to the concept of bad breeding. People will say that "bad breeding" is subjective, and this is true in relativism. What happens when people follow along with this logic is that when "bad breeding" is subjective, other concepts fall over like dominos. "Sodomy" ceases to exist without breeding ethics. More dominos related to breeding fall over, and relativism pays little attention when the domino "race" falls over as well.

However, what continues to happen without race is that eventually the "gender" domino has less resistance to fall than when it was the turn for "race" to topple. Without race, gender actually expands. What should be the classifications for the new people? Hermaphrodites, bisexuals, eunuchs, mutants, and so forth, need to understand what their place is. There is now more discrimination because breeding was disrespected. So it turns out that breeding must not be disregarded. People need to be able to think apart from relativism, because what is "bad breeding" cannot be debated in societies that honor marriage.

Back to the original question: What does "racist" mean? The answer is that "racist" must be defined by breed, and not subjectively. For my breed, that word is defined by one person: the highest breeder. Having claimed nobility and birthright in my flock, the word "racist" means exactly what I say that word means:

racist n - bad breeder.
racist v - bad breeding behavior.

5) Many FrostCloud members are completely baffled by what you write. Does this frustrate you in any way, or are you purposely trying to confuse people?

I'm not trying to confuse people. Let me just say that, in some ways, our dialogues are radical encounters. When my message sounds like the discordant theme of a fugue, please look twice before accusing me of being off topic.

When I feel frustrated here, it is because you have created a very high quality community, and connecting with some of these people gives me exhilaration, when that happens.

6) Many Christians find it sinful to have sexual relations with the same sex. Yet, you state in your profile that you're a "Christian lesbian". Does this bother you that many people of your same faith find your stance morally wrong?

I am an angel breeder, born, bred, and ascended to solve the problems caused by bad breeding. Bad breeding leads to homosexuality, I am the opposite of a bad breeder. Pity the racists who would bring on segregation for their bigotry. In my experience, their behavior changes when they meet me.

I recently enjoyed flirting with the woman I got to have significant monogamous relations status with. I earned a year to publicly do this as a noble, after doing my faithkeeper duty in The Hague. Let's see if dry, romantic comedy remains a valid genre.

The people who would deny my right to marry and love my wife do not understand Christianity as faith. The fact that these people have created so much racism that some now want to ignore angels' rights, tells the Christian world that this culture is not self governable.

Think good thoughts, build community with faith, and the revolution will be televised.

7) How do you see the world within the next 100 years?

Uncertainty is an issue, but I'll break down the next 100 years by organizing principle changes:

Present to 2005 - Cult of Racists

Culture war politics leads to the door of genocide, and the rising tide cannot be stem cell researched.

2005-2020 - Chaos Control

Freedom hits the wall, and the machine will not allow exodus from tyrannical power, so the cultists give way to sycophants. A counter intelligencia emerges with a politics that understands the flock of flocks (religions), as well as democratic principles. The effect of alternative energy on society begins another bifurcation process when non-traditionalists and anti-globalists form the coalition to upset the oil barons. When the system comes into balance, there is a return to statesmanship.

2020-2070 - Epochal Renaissance

After culture war politics loses all momentum, the world settles on a new organizing principle. The folks who don't like to say "Christian Civilization" will have their own ways of talking about everything.

2070-21?? - Managed Reformation

Peace, love, and understanding hit the wall, but some people know that is coming, so the energy has decent channels to explore. The result is productive freedom: enterprise. Meanwhile, nobles build castles by the faith of the counter reformation.

8) Anything else you'd like to say to the members?

I really enjoy the vitality of this community. Others of you probably disregard much of what I say, and I can understand, because that is what your life experience tells you to do. Perhaps the better interactions have to involve us talking past each other to a point, and choosing to elaborate entire concepts rather than attacking our disagreements.

Thank you Icest0rm, for the thoughtful questions.

Peace, love and understanding,

Rita Hill von Habsburg, Princess/Knight

Website · by **ladyattis** » Sun Sep 19, 2004 17:09

Nothing personal but when you call people that are 'hermaphrodites'/intersexed evil and etc you usually are going to lose 99.9% of your audience. Same with the anti-jewish comments. I don't know how being xyy makes you anything other than xyy, you decide who you are not the other way around, quit playing essentialism.

-- Bridget

by **Francois Tremblay** » Sun Sep 19, 2004 17:11

And don't forget that homosexuality is caused by bad breeding !

Website · by **ladyattis** » Sun Sep 19, 2004 17:13

Oh yea, them thar evil homos! F00k that I'm a bisexual bitch and I love it. So go f00k yerself.

-- Bridget Meh new blog!

by **Leouna** » Sun Sep 19, 2004 17:45

ladyattis wrote:Oh yea, them thar evil homos! F00k that I'm a bisexual bitch and I love it. So go f00k yerself.

-- Bridget Meh new blog!

Just don't try to call everybody like you childless.

Lesbian is a title that some women are proud to earn

Website · by **ladyattis** » Sun Sep 19, 2004 17:48

Nothing wrong with being childless, duhhhhhh! Cause lemme think there's almost 7 billion people on the Earth and we can only feed 4 billion? Now ask this question who should disappear/die?

Not easy to look at your sophistry in that lense eh?

-- Bridget, Anti-breeder, Slogan: Save the humans!

graveyard of the gods

George Tent DCI Equals Rita Hill Archangel Breeder?

Who is online