Page 1 of 6

George Tent DCI Equals Rita Hill Archangel Breeder?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 18:40
by Leouna
I turned 48 today, and understanding how tyranny works, just knew that the racists would find an obnoxious way to give me a birthday present. Then I looked at this New York Times article:

C.I.A. Chief Says He's Corrected Cheney Privately
By DOUGLAS JEHL
Published: March 10, 2004

WASHINGTON, March 9 — George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, told a Senate committee on Tuesday that he had privately intervened on several occasions to correct what he regarded as public misstatements on intelligence by Vice President Dick Cheney and others, and that he would do so again....


Whoa, wait a minute. George Tent DCI, don't you mean George Tent DCIA? There it is though right there:
George Tenet "Director of Central Intelligence".

Are you telling me that a jew is acknowledging the difference between angels and hermaphrodites? That is SURE what that sounds like to me. That would totally be OK for me in that case. To tell you the truth, I wasn't really looking forward to being greeted as DCI, Rita Hill. No offense, well, maybe a little offense, not much offense.

What I would like more than DCI, Rita Hill, is Archangel Breeder, Rita Hill. This way I can tell the jew boys to get out of the lesbian lounge, because archangel breeders make kids with angel women, no men. That would be a REAL birthday present.

Let this not be a dream, and I wake up tomorrow DCI all over again.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 19:34
by rapa-nui
Image

It's OK Rita... the men in white coats are just here to take you away and make you feel better... after a short and quick proceedure that is...


Image

It only stings for one second and then it's over!

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 19:36
by NoDeity
So, which came first for you, Rita... the paranoid delusions or the antiSemitism? Are they intimately linked or is it merely coincidental that you have both?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 20:12
by NoDeity
...and happy birthday. Let's see what this week's horoscope has for you:
Pisces: (Feb. 19—March 20)
Gradual, almost imperceptible change will make you a better person over the course of the next 37,000 years.
http://www.theonion.com/horoscopes/

Sweet!

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 21:06
by Leouna
It's OK Rita... the men in white coats are just here to take you away and make you feel better... after a short and quick procedure that is...

The men in white coats met the MiBs instead.

So, which came first for you, Rita... the paranoid delusions or the anti-Semitism? Are they intimately linked or is it merely coincidental that you have both?

If I'm an anti-Semite then why would I give a Jewess the first shot at me? Abandon false dichotomies. It's more about the non-linear reality that is created when the gods of Hannibal are unleashed.


...and happy birthday. Let's see what this week's horoscope has for you:
Pisces: (Feb. 19—March 20)
Gradual, almost imperceptible change will make you a better person over the course of the next 37,000 years.


They were trying to hold my mom out for the Ides, but I just had to get out and say hello. She kept the bloody bed cover for years.

I'm a Pisces fish and the river runs through my soul.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 21:32
by NoDeity
What could I possibly add to that?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 21:36
by rapa-nui
An IP trace and an e-mail to a licensed psychologist to make sure this guy/gal/thing is not dangerous?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 22:12
by NoDeity
Being outa yer fookin' tree ain't a crime. :)

I have a good friend who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia. Like most mentally ill people, he's not dangerous.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 22:19
by Francois Tremblay
Most mentally ill people are dangerous. Unfortunately, their illness is not recognized as such.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 23:08
by NoDeity
You mean religionists and paranormalists? :lol: Yeah, they can be dangerous -- even more so than those who are recognized as crazy.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 23:19
by Francois Tremblay
I don't see any difference between people who say they talk to Satan, and people who say they talk to Jesus. Or people who believe in a sky-pixie that created everything with a click of the fingers and told them how to live.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 23:31
by NoDeity
Yeah, the difference is only one of widespread public acceptability. My friend told me that he was privy to a meeting between Queen Elizabeth, Brian Mulroney, George Bush, and Billy Graham. Most people would recognize that something is not quite right with him. When Pat Robertson says that God has given him a message for America, so many people nod approvingly that those of us who laugh are the ones who are seen as crazy.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 23:40
by Francois Tremblay
a meeting between Queen Elizabeth, Brian Mulroney, George Bush, and Billy Graham.


Image What was the punchline ?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 03:07
by NoDeity
The punch almost came when I laughed...

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:30
by Leouna
Why There Are Angels

By Rita Hill von Habsburg, Princess/Knight of the Golden Fleece

Some say we need angels because people breed in races which need to maintain their hybridity by letting the angels breed.

This cannot be right, because some people prefer to interbreed or not to have children who breed.

Some people say that there need to be angels, because without angels, religions lose the concept of sodomy, and marriage means nothing.

This does not matter in world where marriage is not required for having children, and marriage is an institution that imprisons the righteous.

Some people say that there need to be angels, because without angels, humans devolve into cannibals.

This does not matter, because many people are driven in pursuit of their primary love object, and would rather be cannibals than to see theirs with an angel.

Some people say there need to be angels, because without angels, the family unit goes away, and we don't have mom, dad, and the kids anymore.

This can't be the solution, in whole, because there are plenty of people who contribute to society who are not going to be family people.

No, there is only one real reason why there are angels:

Without angels, there cannot be The Game.

This is why there are angels.